assistant's blog

2010 Spring Meeting and Collaboration

The Spring Meeting was held on April 22 and the Spring Collaboration was held on April 23.  Resources from some of the speakers are available below.

MDE Update - John Melick

BOT Update - Karen Balmer

April 2010 MACTE Minute

Aligning K-12 and Teacher Education Standards

Currently, there are many ideas for improving teacher preparation and K-12 schooling currently being
discussed in the legislature. Among them, concerns have been raised about whether teacher education
standards are aligned with student standards. In keeping with our status as a leader in education,
Minnesota has set our standards for both K-12 students and teacher education to align primarily with
national standards for professional specialty organizations in education. As national standards for students
have been made more rigorous, Minnesota has revised standards for K-12 students. Assuming that the
common core standards for math and language arts are adopted, new revisions to the K-12 standards will
occur very soon. Revisions to student standards have been followed by revisions to teaching standards at
both the national and state levels - in a continuous iterative cycle. Furthermore, professional standards for
teaching recognize the need for teacher competence in content, general pedagogy, and content-specific
pedagogy.  See full posiition statement.
 

January 2010 MACTE Minute

An important anniversary, for which we offer a small remembrance this morning, somehow slipped past us in 2009.   We should mark this event for the significant influence it has on our work, both for those who prepare Minnesota’s teachers and for those who guide the licensure process authorizing their practice.  During the fall of 1999 a new word began to dominate our conversations with colleagues and students.  Then new to the work of teacher preparation after serving as an instructional developer and program evaluator, I first encountered “The Minnesota Standards of Effective Practice for Teachers” during a June conference hosted by the Board.  At that gathering I learned that Minnesota’s colleges would soon use these new “SEPs” to identify, instruct, and assess the pedagogical knowledge and skills to be acquired by Minnesota’s future teachers.   Where once the number of course credits, course titles, and their descriptions were criteria for approving a program of study leading to a teaching license, now our colleges would provide evidence that their candidates’ preparation included sufficient and appropriate opportunities to learn, practice, and to be assessed on the knowledge and skills described by each of the 140 SEPs as well as the content standards for each licensure area.   See full position statement.

Syndicate content